Why are so many Rightwingnuts so anxious to promote Barack Obamma? The answer is; he cannot win in the genteral election and a Republican can easily become president AGAIN if he is nominated.
Folks; The general public is still asleep. They are buying into the propaganda that Obamma would be a great president. Americans made it easy for GW Bush to steal the election of 2000 by not being inquisitive enough to research his background which was easily known by those who did.
Therefore, they went to the polls and voted for an unknown quantity by slovenly casting their votes for a man who's past performance was concealed from the public. Kudos to those intelligent people who DID the research and discovered that GW was an anathema to the very idea of Americanism.
Now I am not saying that Barrack is in any way shape or form like GW. What I AM saying is that there is no true record of his performance because he is simply an untried and unknown quantity, much like Bush was during the 2000 election.
Americans helped choose an unknown quantity by giving Bush enough votes to help facilitate the stealing of the election; ie; the irregularities in Florida and finally, the intervention of the Supreme Court when it was obvious GW was going to lose the election.
Obamma may or may not prove to be a decent president, but why gamble with such a powerful position in times like these?
The fact that Hilary Clinton shows more than twice the support in the polls, gives comfort that the people are in their right minds.
What with her enemies working so dastardly hard to defame and smear her , we know she is the most capable and squeaking clean candidate because she has been put through all sorts of scrutiny. The worst thing they have to say is "she's ambitious". That's such a laugh; the rest of the candidates aren't ambitious?
Obamma has a lot of ambition attempting to become president after only serving a couple of years in the Senate. But he's being used as a weapon against Hilary by the disgruntled Rightees who are so afraid of Hilary's success, that they will attempt anything to defame the great lady.
The KNOW that with Hilary and Bill, there is hope that this great nation will be getting back on track; Bill's record speaks for itself. Just a few of his major successes are; (1) We were loved and accepted all over the globe due to his diplomacy (2) We had a projected surplus in our treasury and had just about paid down the interest on our deficit (250 billion per year).
22 million new and well-paying jobs were made as well as higher pay for everyone. (3) No major wars (Bill and Hilary are NOT oil tycoons nor connected with war manufacturing ) (4) Crime dropped because there was money to put more policemen/women on the streets (5)more money for hospitals, schools, buildings, roads, etc. With money in our coffers, states were given more funds to implement the addition of more policemen, build roads and bridges, hospitals etc., etc.
These are just SOME of the benefits Americans enjoyed during the Clinton presidency.
I remember food prices, gas prices , college tuitions, and the likes remaining stable.
Why would an intelligent American voter want to roll the dice again rather than vote for the tried and true Clinton ticket? It makes no sense.
The pundits keep saying tha tHilary is "public speaking handicapped" I don't think they ever really listened to her. She gave me goosebumps when she spoke in Alabama---and yet---one idiot had the audacity to say she didn't "hit the mark".
I am so glad that Americans are waking up to realize that the major news media is owned by those greedy corporate conglomerates who are concerned that Hilary may be a "trust-buster" if she has her way. Well we know that Bill admired Teddy Roosevelt, who is best known for trustbusting. Could this be why they keep putting her down? Nonetheless, people will make their own determination now, having seen how the media mislead them into thinking that their choice, GW, was the best one at that time.
People are beginning to realize just how much politics affects them in their own homes; the prices of food, gas, oil etc. for the masses ought to be a good sign that Bush was part of the few elite rich who wanted everything for themselves.
I don't want to brag, but back in 2000, I COULD HAVE TOLD YA ALL SO ! I even predicted that the Sudan would become a part of the Bush strategy. It didn't take a rocket scientist to predict it---he brought up Saddam Hussein during the debates! What did Saddam, the Iranians and the Sudan all have in common? OIL
Hilary is head and shoulders above the rest. She has forsight and hindsight and knows what is needed for America. She has strength and is very accomplished and knows how to unite people. Above all of these virtues, is the God-given Common sense she shows each time she speaks to us.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Edwards is my first choice, but I'm leaning towards Obama for my 2nd, mainly because he *should* have some personal understanding of Islam, which should be important for diplomacy, etc. Isn't Clinton was too hated to win? Especially by the `news media', who will report the campaign, rather than records and proposed policies.
Well, my friend, Hillary is ahead in all of the polls. Isn't it time to quit buying the spew of the vitreolic Rightwingnut smear propoganda? You bet it is! America is waking up to the lies, smears and accusations of the rabid Rightees. Hillary is proving herself to be the best qualified to lead us. The lady has what it takes to lead this dissheveled nation out of its gloom and doom politics of the inept, incompetent and downright corrupt Republican Regime headed by a small phalanx of greedy, fascistic Men
Post a Comment